A friend recently e-mailed me this article by Dee Dee Myers on the BP oil spill. She argues that--despite the fact that big government appears to  have done virtually nothing to prevent or clean up the oil spill--we have no other alternative but to rely on big government. She asks "What aspect of the endlessly unfolding disaster off the Louisiana coast  would have been made better with less government?" The answer is that quite a few aspects might have been made considerably better.
Certainly, we  need some government and some regulations. But how much  government and what kinds of regulations would be most beneficial? In this case, having  less government bureaucracy may not have done much to help  clean up the spill. But since the huge bureaucracy we have appears to  have been impotent to either prevent or solve the problem, it  at least  seems reasonable to raise the question of why we should be spending all  of those tax-payers' dollars to pay the salaries of so many useless  bureaucrats. Could we be making better use of that money? Perhaps we  could be using it to reduce the national debt or to provide tax relief  to help  stimulate the economy.
What I'm primarily concerned with in this  particular case, however, are the unintended adverse consequences of  government regulations. For example, if environmental laws had been more lax, it may  have actually been better for both the environment and the economy, as  paradoxical as that may seem to big-government advocates. Perhaps BP and other oil companies would  have been able to drill more wells on land and in shallower waters closer to shore.  And maybe they would have drilled fewer expensive, risky deep-water wells, in which it's much harder to plug leaks. Another concern  I have is that--due to the political fallout from this BP spill--the  government may make it even harder to get drilling permits. An  unintended consequence of that would be that we'd have to bring in more  imported oil in tankers. But the safety record for transporting oil in  tankers is significantly worse than for offshore drilling. So, besides increasing  energy prices and the trade deficit,  banning more drilling could actually increase the amount of oil that ends  up being spilled.
Friday, June 4, 2010
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
 
